Our approach to education is reproducing society’s worst neuroses. The alternative isn’t institutional reform, but a different consciousness.

The party cadre Jiao Yulu embodied a Chinese political culture with room for experiments and risk-taking. Xi’s turn to digital technocracy may threaten its survival.

America’s elite universities have an aristocratic mission. The Confucian tradition has lessons for how to achieve it.

While in Lebanon to report on a disintegrating state, I found Hezbollah building a different kind of regime.

One man’s thought has become pivotal in China’s new political and cultural crackdowns. That man is not Xi Jinping.

Sci-Hub has become foundational for scientific research. What if we didn’t need it at all?

Xi wants to guide China’s thinkers with a clear party line. But that line is just one rallying point in a complex intellectual ecology.

While in Tokyo for the Summer Olympics, I instead saw the spectacle of Japan’s aspiring new elites.

The Japanese Empire founded Kenkoku University to create new pan-Asian elites. Despite their own defeat, they succeeded.

In the midst of Japan’s chaotic Sengoku era, a radical Buddhist sect carved out a new regime. Then came the real test.

Fundamental change only comes from outside established paradigms. Without room for new founders, progress is impossible.

In postwar France, Charles de Gaulle unified executive power with a technocratic state and a national story. His model still endures around the world.

The threat of mass panic lurks behind our mechanisms of political control. What if we were allowed to fear?

Reject the marginal gains. Change the balance of power.

To understand the return of China’s party-state, look no further than its love affair with ketamine.

Science has become a bank for political legitimacy. It hasn’t survived intact.

New discoveries are adding millennia to our past. The implications should change our future.

Reforming America’s vanguard city is a national imperative.